Main Menu
Tagcloud
Top Posts
I support
Car articles:
Random items:
Random pics
RSS Feeds
aggregators
Facebook Blog Network
linking back to brembs.net
Welcome Guest
Currently Online (25)
Extra Information
MicroBlog
Networking
Random Video
SciSites
GeoCounter
Gerti and Schatzi repeatedly looked behind the mirror and showed several bouts of behavior indicating contingency testing. Subjects moved their head or the whole body back and forth in front of the mirror in a systematic way.
This is, of course, the type of spontaneous behavior one would generate to find out what portion of the currently perceived scene is actually caused by the individual. Animals with a concept of 'self' use the operant reafference principle to find out if it really is themselves they perceive in the mirror. You generate behavior in such an erratic way that only you could be the source of any contingent sensory feedback (visual feedback as in the case of the mirror). Until this study, only a few animal species have been reported to recognize themselves in the mirror so far, 4 great apes, bottlenose dolphins and Asian elephants. All of these animals do this contingency testing. Of course, we humans are no exception to this rule. Probably the most iconographic scene exemplifying this behavior is the mirror scene in the movie "Duck Soup" where Groucho Marx is doing the testing. I've put magpie Gerti (video from the original paper) and Groucho side by side for a comparison:
Posted on Wednesday 27 August 2008 - 10:15:55
comment: 0
comment: 0| marx gerti magpies mirror operant contingency |
Render time: 0.6266 sec, 0.4016 of that for queries.














