Paul Chapman
chapmanPF@cardiff.ac.uk
School of Bioscience, Cardiff
University, UK.
Creating models of human
disease is one important use of genetic modification in mammals. Where
genetic mutations are known to produce a disorder in humans, those mutations
can be reproduced in animals by using knock-out, knock-in or transgenic
overexpression of the relevant genes. In the case of Alzheimer's disease,
there are several mutations known to either produce (in an autosomal dominant
fashion) or seriously increase the risk of developing the disease. By over-expressing
one of these mutant proteins in mice, we have access to a model that not
only allows us to study Alzheimer's disease in a way that is impossible
in humans, but also may give us insight into the basic processes of learning
and memory. Our investigations have focused on one particular line of transgenic
mice that over-express a mutated form of the human amyloid-precursor protein
(HuAPP). Although the specific mutation introduced in this case is rather
rare, APP is implicated in most (if not all) cases of Alzheimer's disease.
Thus, the overproduction of mutated HuAPP in these mice leads to many classic
signs of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology, including elevated concentrations
of beta-amyloid and its deposition into neuritic plaques. Our task in analysing
this mice was to observe the development of behavioural and electrophysiological
abnormalities, and to determine whether or not they are related to the
presence of Alzheimer's-like neuropathology.
The transgenic approach
means that we have some degree of confidence that the aetiology and developmental
time-course are similar to those of the human disorder. The value of having
the mouse model is that it permits us to use a range of approaches to get
at the problem of how Alzheimer's disease begins, what physiological processes
are affected (particularly in the early stages) and what we can do to reverse
these processes. Thus, we can train the mice on a range of behavioural
tasks (spatial reference memory, spatial working memory, recognition memory
etc.), then do electrophysiological experiments on the same animals, either
in vivo or in vitro, and finally, examine in detail any neurochemical or
structural pathologies. This means that we can, in theory, determine whether
working memory or reference memory deficits occur first, and whether one
or the other of them are better correlated with (for example) LTP deficits
in the dentate gyrus and soluble beta-amyloid, or with LTP deficits in
CA1 and fibrillar amyloid deposits. In addition to reviewing some of the
data that relate to this approach, it is worth our time to consider a strategy
by which we can determine the appropriate sets of electrophysiological
and behavioural tests to help us fully characterise the disorder at various
stages of development. The conclusion I hope we can reach is that the examination
of mouse models of Alzheimer's disease will give us insight into not only
the disease itself. |