E.B. Keverne
ebk10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Sub-Department of Animal
Behaviour, University of Cambridge, UK.
Genomic imprinting is itself
a relatively new finding in mammalian genetics and confers functional differences
on parental genomes such that certain autosomal alleles are only expressed
when they originate from the father (maternally imprinted and silenced),
whereas others are only expressed on passage through the matriline (paternally
imprinted and silenced). Maternal and paternal genomes are not, therefore,
transcriptionally equivalent, and both sets of autosomal alleles are required
for normal development and function.
An important means of investigating
genomic imprinting in the brain has been achieved by the construction of
chimeras. Embryos constructed from a mixture of cells that are parthenogenetic/normal
(Pg) or androgenetic/normal (Ag) do survive, but survival requires the
total proportion of chimeric cells not to exceed normal cells. The precise
locations in the brain to which these chimeric cells, participate in development
can be determined by the presence of a genetic marker (b globin, or LacZ).
Using these techniques a clear and distinct patterning in brain development
emerges. At birth, cells that are disomic for the paternal genome contribute
substantially to those parts of the brain that are important for primary
motivated behaviour (hypothalamus, pre-optic area BNST and septum) and
are excluded, from the developing neocortex and striatum. At the earliest
stages of brain development (days 9-10), Ag cells are present in all neural
tissues and as gestation progresses they proliferate extensively in the
medio-basal forebrain, but at parturition are virtually absent from telencephalic
structures. By contrast parthenogenetic cells are excluded from these medio-basal
forebrain areas, but selectively accumulate in those regions where Ag cells
are excluded, especially neocortex and striatum.
If genomic imprinting has
any impact on behaviour, these findings, along with human clinical findings
of Prader-Willi syndrome, would point to paternally expressed imprinted
genes influencing motivated behaviours such as sexual, feeding, aggressive
and maternal behaviour. We have recently investigated two paternally expressed
genes (Peg 1 and Peg 3) which have been mutated by inserting a promoterless
b geo cassette into the 5’ coding exon to study both the function and expression
of these genes in mice. Inheritance of the mutation from the paternal,
but not the maternal germ line, causes a severe impairment in maternal
behaviour, resulting in a complete loss of progeny in the first generation.
In Peg 3 offspring survival improves with subsequent generations but all
aspects of maternal behaviour and ability to suckle the pups are impaired,
resulting in a slower growth rate of non-mutant offspring. The brain phenotype
of these null mutants has a smaller nuclear areas (PVN, SON, BNST) in the
hypothalamus and fewer neurons staining positive for the peptide, oxytocin.
Since the magno-cellular oxytocinergic neurons control milk let-down and
the parvocellular oxytocinergic neurons are important for maternal behaviour,
these findings may account for the behavioural and nurturient phenotype.
It is therefore interesting
that two imprinted genes, both of which are paternally expressed, map to
similar areas of the developing brain as revealed from the distribution
of Ag chimaeric cells. Moreover, they both have impact on primary motivated
behaviour as predicted from chimaeras and interestingly mutations of these
two paternally expressed genes impair maternal behaviour. |