linking back to brembs.net





Welcome Guest
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
 Currently Online (23)
 Extra Information
MicroBlog
NeuroTwitter

[31 Aug 10: 19:42]
Nice read: Neuroscientist’s Embarrassment: Artificial Intelligence’s Opportunity. Mark Changizi

[27 Aug 10: 01:31]
Commenting issue on bjoern.brembs.net fixed!

[26 Aug 10: 16:33]
Comments are not working on bjoern.brembs.net right now. I'm working on the problem.

[17 Aug 10: 10:55]
Anybody waiting for a reply from me? I'm sorting out SMTP issues with the hotel here

[29 Jul 10: 01:55]
Just as now access to drinking water is a human right, access to the literature should be a scientific right.

[13 Jul 10: 13:05]
Just registered for this year's SfN meeting in San Diego. Are you coming, too?


Networking
Random Video
SciSites
GeoCounter
outils webmaster
editors
Measuring editors' performance objectively
Editors of schorarly, peer-reviewed journals often claim that somehow their choosiness is the most important verdict on the quality of a scientific manuscript. Points in case are Nature Neuroscience's peer-review policy,...[more]
editors   Nature   science publishing   open access   science politics   peer-review   
Posted on Saturday 05 July 2008 - 06:42:51

The future of scientific publishing
I'm sure nobody ending up on this obscure blog could have missed the current frenzy about a Nature news article by Declan Butler attacking PLoS. In the meatime, there has been a ...[more]
editors   science publishing   open access   science politics   peer-review   
Posted on Monday 07 July 2008 - 08:41:05

Journals - the dinosaurs of scientific communication
The recent kerfuffle caused by Butler's article in Nature seems to have gotten quite a number of stones rolling. What I thought would be a rather slow process seems to be speeding up considerably because of Nature's rath...[more]
editors   science publishing   open access   open science   science blogging   science politics   PLoS One   
Posted on Saturday 19 July 2008 - 13:13:40

Comment to the editors
Here's what I have been starting to write to the editors of journals who want me to rate the manuscripts I review according to some subjective standard:

...[more]
editors   peer-review   post-publication review   rating   
Posted on Monday 10 May 2010 - 10:43:17

As if we needed more evidence
As if we needed yet more evidence that the way we communicate science is FUBAR! Read this and weep:
How to Publish a Scientific Comment in 123 Easy Steps

I was alerted to this article by Bora Zivkovic, who got it from ...[more]
science publishing   editors   
Posted on Wednesday 19 August 2009 - 03:47:01

...[more]
science   politics   science politics   editors   science publishing   
Posted on Wednesday 31 December 1969 - 19:00:00

Render time: 0.8637 sec, 0.5996 of that for queries.