linking back to brembs.net






My lab:
lab.png
Welcome Guest
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
 Currently Online (18)
 Extra Information
MicroBlog
NeuroTwitter

[14 Oct 11: 05:45]
Just received an email from a computer science student - with an AOL email address?

[03 Jul 11: 16:26]
Google citation alerts suck: I just found out by accident I rolled over h-index of 13 and 500 citations http://bjoern.brembs.net/citations.php

[21 May 11: 12:14]
6.15pm: Does god have Alzheimer? No #rapture in Europe...

[01 May 11: 05:31]
w00t! Just been invited to present at OKCon 2011! #OKCon2011

[13 Mar 11: 05:59]
Review on "Spontaneous decisions and operant conditioning in fruit flies" out http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.005

[09 Feb 11: 12:01]
Rule of thumb for revising manuscripts: for every point the reviewer raises, change something, anything in the manuscript.


Networking

Random Video
SciSites
GeoCounter
outils webmaster
retractions
Increased publication pressure leading to increasing retractions?

I've already mentioned the correlation between the declining number of tenured positions in science and the increasing rate of retractions:

tenure_small.png


Clearly, correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation, but the conclusion is t...[more]
retractions   incentives   pressure   impact factor   misconduct   fraud   
Posted on Tuesday 16 August 2011 - 10:51:03

The decline of tenure and the rise of retractions: causation or correlation?
Amidst the recent flurry of discussions about research assessment strategies came Neil Saunders and posted his analysis of the number of retractions indexed in PubMed. At the same time, Giorgio Gilestro weighed in with h...[more]
tenure   retractions   pressure   misconduct   
Posted on Thursday 02 December 2010 - 13:31:15

Retractions correlate better with 'Impact Factor' than citations

ResearchBlogging.org
Thomson Reuters' Impact Factor (IF) is supposed to provide a measure for how often the average publication in a scientific journal is cited and thus a quantitative basis for ranking journals. However, there are (at least...[more]
citations   impact factor   retractions   bibliometrics   misconduct   fraud   
Posted on Thursday 18 August 2011 - 03:59:22

Do you really want to publish in a high-retraction journal?

With more than 24,000 scholarly journals in which some piece of relevant research may be published, a ranking scheme seems like a boon: one only needs to read articles from a small, high-ranking subset of journals and sa...[more]
citations   bibliometrics   impact factor   retractions   
Posted on Friday 09 December 2011 - 05:55:12

//
Render time: 0.8432 sec, 0.4313 of that for queries.
UA-4203938-1